New Idea
-
- Kazukima
- Archmage
I'm sorry if this idea was already thought of!
I came up with the idea because of my friend Alicia
There have been times when the campains have not been all too fair.
There have been sides that one too many times in a row where one completely dominates the other.
I propose that the GA make it so there are some people that change their class from OJs to Greens in order to even out the teams.
But this does not have to be by forcing the poeple to change sides.
The GA just has to add an option that asks the player if he/she would mind changing their team.
If they accept the option then the next round the game randomly selects people to change sides or leave them on a side based on the fact if there is an equal amount of people.
It makes sure that everyone has an option on what they want to do and it makes the people happy.
The people that do not like the option can just reject the option through the setting, while the other people can turn on the option.
I came up with the idea because of my friend Alicia
There have been times when the campains have not been all too fair.
There have been sides that one too many times in a row where one completely dominates the other.
I propose that the GA make it so there are some people that change their class from OJs to Greens in order to even out the teams.
But this does not have to be by forcing the poeple to change sides.
The GA just has to add an option that asks the player if he/she would mind changing their team.
If they accept the option then the next round the game randomly selects people to change sides or leave them on a side based on the fact if there is an equal amount of people.
It makes sure that everyone has an option on what they want to do and it makes the people happy.
The people that do not like the option can just reject the option through the setting, while the other people can turn on the option.
-
- Anvar
- Archmage
HA! You're kidding, right?? The balance has been swung so far in favor of Animators for a LONG WHILE, like around 10 months.
Besides, GA already gives bonus to an academy in a campaign if they've lost a previous round in it, unless things have changed.
Besides, GA already gives bonus to an academy in a campaign if they've lost a previous round in it, unless things have changed.
-
- Kazukima
- Archmage
That's why I proposed that they make it so the sides would be even...
Do you really want to get awarded for being the losers?
Do you really want to get awarded for being the losers?
-
- Anvar
- Archmage
Simply put, you cannot force someone to change sides. That breaks up team cohesion. What do you want, a draft of some sort? How would it be implemented, and is it even possible within the confines of the SC app?
Sorry to sound like a "Debbie Downer", but I just can't agree with this. It's been suggested before, and I've always opposed such drastic action. If a team is weak, they can recruit from the other in-game, or find friends who will play on their team out of game.
Sorry to sound like a "Debbie Downer", but I just can't agree with this. It's been suggested before, and I've always opposed such drastic action. If a team is weak, they can recruit from the other in-game, or find friends who will play on their team out of game.
-
- Kazukima
- Archmage
I said... it would be an option found in the settings if they would like to change sides or not.
It is not a matter of force or not...
I'm sorry I am bringing up the same topic but I already warned you of that.
But look at you. You obveously don't mind that you lose.
I'm speaking from the winning side, I wouldn't mind helping the losing side and I'm sure no one wants to stay losing.
It is not a matter of force or not...
I'm sorry I am bringing up the same topic but I already warned you of that.
But look at you. You obveously don't mind that you lose.
I'm speaking from the winning side, I wouldn't mind helping the losing side and I'm sure no one wants to stay losing.
-
- Seldon
- Archmage
The easiest way to fix the competitiveness issue would be to break up larger battlegroups like the US regionals. In a smaller BG with less players, a dedicated group of mages can win even against superior numbers (like the Louisiana Liberators did).
But whatever GA's goals with this game are, having competitive play does not appear to be high on the list.
But whatever GA's goals with this game are, having competitive play does not appear to be high on the list.
-
- Anvar
- Archmage
Seldon
The easiest way to fix the competitiveness issue would be to break up larger battlegroups like the US regionals. In a smaller BG with less players, a dedicated group of mages can win even against superior numbers (like the Louisiana Liberators did).
But whatever GA's goals with this game are, having competitive play does not appear to be high on the list.
That's true. Thanks for the shout-out, Sel.
